Writing Resources
As scientists make new discoveries and learn more about human genetics a multitude of new arguments will arise As is in the case of the MAO A gene this gene is frequently utilized in our court system and associated to antisocial behavior In this paper I will give my opinion on why I believe this gene should not be the sole factor when reaching a verdict In my opinion allowing genetic evidence should not consider generic evidence cannot justify the crime but on the individuals acting to break the law and cause pain and suffering to those who choose to abide by it Some believe certain people are born with a gene that makes them aggressive and are more likely to have criminal tendencies On the other hand others argue that individuals that experience hard environment and social experiences are more likely to have criminal behavior A case of nature against nurture Data suggest that average citizens do not share the belief that genetic data can help identify defendants whose behavior is sufficiently beyond their voluntary control to warrant findings of diminished responsibility e g conviction of manslaughter rather than murder or to mitigate sentences Appelbaum and Scurich 2014 p 96 I believe that the individual committing the crime has the control over their actions and behavior Everyone has different motives on why they commit crimes whether necessity or is simply a matter of wanting something so badly they are willing to withstand the consequences
