Subcategory:
Category:
Words:
322Pages:
1Views:
188What is track one diplomacy and why does religious and cultural conflict in the 21st century pose particular problems for it Track one diplomacy is also known as interstate diplomacy A formal interaction and communication tool that is used between nation states by governmental officials diplomats high level political and military leaders for negotiations treaties trade policies and other international agreements With focus being on ceasefire peace talks and treaties The process ranges from very formal to informal and can be very adversarial and competitive Track one diplomacy relies on distributive and positional bargaining strategies and many times seen as an assumed as win or lose situation The goal is to maintain power over weaker nations with a balance of power within nations of equal status Track one diplomacy gave states legitimate and authoritative control over war and violence in the sphere of international relations since the Westphalian era In which states of great power were key to war or peace
In restorative and constructive ways while providing realistic promises for those who are seeking to stop violent conflicts It also brings with it understanding which in turn effects reconciliation while eliciting justice in the wake of evil Faith based diplomacy makes it possible for interactions and meetings to take place in a safe environment With a growing recognition of religion spirituality culture and authenticity that is part of international development Globalization has brought into the spot light the influence of religion in international affairs and often through Faith based diplomacy organizations are some of the most trusted institutions in developing countries and important social developing countries It varies from traditional realist diplomacy which is seen as a military solution to national security which embrace policies It emphasizes nation states from a broad perspective within international politics
After al Banna s long period of absence as leader of the Muslim Brotherhood after his assassination they became extremely radicalized in their actions against Egypt and other countries There was a mass immigration that took place within the Muslims Brotherhood member organization to Europe Canada US Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states Therefore teachings then spread around the world at a rapid pace He implemented da wah and jihad While his world view seems to be determined and coherent He preached Pan Islamism and didn t oppose pan Arabism or Egyptian nationalism Sayyid Qubt after studying abroad in the US and also a long period being incarcerated experienced his own personal radicalization with his own perceptions Sayyid Qubt through his writing shows that he went from a moralist to a revolutionary He had a profound impact of the Arab Muslim youth and bringing them back to their roots of Islam He emphasized Islam as being the complete way of life He opposed Arab nationalism and Pan Arabism because he believed Islam is for all His interpretation of Hanna al Banna s theories showed to be at a multi interpretational level Believing all Muslim s primary responsibility should be to establish Allah s order on earth and devoted himself to bringing idea for a total change in the political system