Subcategory:
Category:
Words:
384Pages:
1Views:
276Qualified immunity defense Qualified immunity defense ensures accountability among public officials tend to shield officials from liability and harassment in their line of work The test is not complicated for the officers since they are not liable for official deeds when subjected to objective legal reasonableness test measured through clearly established rules at the moment of the action Officers easily pass the test owed to their discretionary nature of their work The protection shields them from endless lawsuits State civil lawsuits Federal civil rights act and tort lawsuits are often applied to state officers State tort lawsuits sue individuals from damage emanating from issues such as false arrests assault malicious breakages among others On the other hand federal civil rights act allow a plaintiff to seek court intervention against law enforcement officers deputies and their heads for violation of constitutional rights Suing judges and prosecutors for damage Unlike judges prosecutors can be sued for damages Absolute immunity protects judges from such lawsuits but can only be voted out or impeached where the citizens find them to be acting in bad faith Prosecutors fall under functional immunity based on the interaction the prosecutor handled during the proceeding