Subcategory:
Category:
Words:
567Pages:
2Views:
340There is also less stress involved ADR is less time consuming but most importantly it can avoid the costs of any penalties to some extent ADR is an alternative to litigations as it also saves a lot of resources as well as money Another reason why ADR would be more beneficial is that it's more private and especially with celebrities as they don t want detail to be released to the public ADR can encourage earlier settlement because the other party's cost exposure will increase in line with the level of the success fee ADR has disadvantages such as an imbalance of power which isn t fair to the opposing party There are also risks of misuse from meditation There might be lack of legal expertise meaning that court would be necessary The Woolf Reforms failed to discuss domestic violence one of the key issues within the civil justice systems In the article by Jamie Doward several points have been made to reform the civil justice system for domestic violence Vulnerable victims and witnesses will no longer have to be present in court for their partners to be humiliated rather it would be much safer to take a recording of them as they would feel relaxed and speak for themselves with no pressure No actions are being taken and this is having a huge impact on rape victims as they are unable to come forward and make complaints In conclusion the Woolf Reforms was a success as it reduced the cost of litigation and allowed individuals from all classes to solve their disputes through ADR It was more cost efficient to the court and while there were some critics the Woolf Reforms have outshined the disadvantages and are a triumph in the civil justice system