Essay Example on Advantages as well the disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative research methods for researching intimacy

Introduction. I will explain the advantages as well as the disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative research methods for researching intimacy. I will mention the influence of integrating both approaches through the two cases below. The Kinsey survey in which the purpose was to perform a sampling technique that involved over 18000 interviews which were recorded as the entire representative of the US society. Lastly, I will discuss the second case of The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes Lifestyles called also the Natsal study team which was set up in the UK in 1990 as the consequence of the outbreak of HIV, AIDs. The Advantages of Quantitative Qualitative methods. The Kinsey survey conducted which was on a large scale mostly as there included over 18000 interviews. The statistic which was extracted from the questioning revealed in two of the Kinsey's publications. Kinsey et al 1948 which it provides a representation of US society. The benefit of this outcome was the discovery that will utilize a possibly sampling method but the Kinsey study revealed that the survey was done in a manner that derived the sampling method from his previous work. Kinsey's sampling was considered even as infancy in the late '30s but was enhanced over time. The Kinsey surveys win their reputation through his position on academic work on the North American gall wasps. These were carrying on as the result of his study by taking different samples from a distinct area from Canada to Mexico Gathorne Hardy J 2005. It is an acceptance to admit that Kinsey applied his research on the benefit by proposing volunteers were surveyed by who Kinsey looked as sought out as well who sought him out. The Kinsey distinction view was and thriving were the evident disparity was the Natsal selected for as well as a wholly balanced questionnaire Wellings et al 1994.

The Postcode Address File PAF was used by Natsal as it provides a better extent of private residential addresses Wellings et al 1994. Natsal is something that was see as for more evocative as the interviewers proceeded through several calls back with the purpose to reduce a nonresponse rate. The Disadvantage of Quantitative, Qualitative methods. When the Natsal representatives considered its data to show a possible link with sexual behaviour. Alcohol consumption Wellings et al 1994 indicated that it would be equitable to assume that absorbing alcohol sexual conduct could be expected through several of forms. As a consequence of this research, it is clear by Welling that getting less of inhibition will end from consumption that possibly connects to the higher degree of sexual activity. The Study admits a possible causal relationship that could cause an obstacle as well will need more research. Kinsey assessed his discovering by using an orgasm rate which was not seen as an orgasm is an inadequate rate of sexual activity. Since it is clear that not all individuals trust that sexual activity will be limited. Kinsey describes sex in use that it will become dependable that sexual activity will be monitored to use by including the genitals. The sexual behavior is assorted of emotions and shapes a significant role of individuals involved in sex. They have not referred to Kinsey's position in the meaning of sexual activity as well the manner of evaluating it and it means that the researchers interpreted the outcome into a form that will not clarify the explanation as well only measured In the Kinsey research, it was stated that individuals would lie as well exaggerate through the questioning about their sexual practices which it will have some problem to recollect their memories. The method finds out a quantity of examination for regularity in the instance of any inconsistency, identified the interviewer will have investigated the issue until it will be clarified and described.

This view in Kinsey is holding the perspective that he could discern some deceitful response Bullough V L 1994. It is argued that individuals who participate in the same gender sex would sense themselves in danger to be involved in the Natsal research Stanley L 1955. Conducted by an AIDS community body of 500 homosexual men questioned half of them admitted that they would reject any involvement if selected. This response was expected as through the '80s the press explained that the illiberality of gay affinity. Stanley was self-assured by the low level of same-gender sexual behavior that Natsal identified and also explained that men who engaged in sex with men, women had sex with women choose out of the whole survey. The importance of integrating advantage disadvantage. The problem when cross-examining Natal's research will erode the merit of survey research as a structure for more analyzing social phenomena. This permits that if adequately planned, managed sex surveys provide essential data that let to the new perception that constructs a tendency of sexual behavior currently in some individuals. Surveys will not see good enough with the pragmatism of tasking all data on a matter that are private sensitive yet it as he points out that study is among the influential apparatus to our understanding for research of intimate. Conclusion. The survey conveying out by the two bodies mentioned let the findings to be approximate to a widespread area of the community with a level of trust They are important methods of outlining shapping, our social approach, and identity through a reflection apparatus. Surveys will not see sufficient good with the pragmatism of tasking all data on a matter that are private sensitive yet it as the points state that study is among the powerful apparatus to our learning for research of intimate.

Write and Proofread Your Essay
With Noplag Writing Assistance App

Plagiarism Checker

Spell Checker

Virtual Writing Assistant

Grammar Checker

Citation Assistance

Smart Online Editor

Start Writing Now

Start Writing like a PRO